Can I keep TCS off?

[WanderingTs]

While wheeling I often find reasons to stop long enough to turn off the engine. Each time I turn the engine back on, for safety reasons (per the owners manual) the XK has reset itself to the TCS fully back on setting. I know there are liability issues that would make Jeep set it up this way, but I find it to be a pain. Has anyone found a "cheat code" to enable the Jeep to stay in whatever mode you set it in even if you turn off the engine?

[Matt]

That's a good question.... kind of like a "key dance" to keep tcs off. Would be awesome if one existed!

[07JeepXK]

Unfortunately I dont think there is anything you can do for this.

[AJeepZJ]

I almost NEVER play the 'big-brother' role, because i'm the daredevil myself... But, I actually think it's a good idea that it is set up the way it is. Objectively speaking, i can see the advantage of what you are suggesting. But that TCS saves folks on the road, you'd only have to forget once turn it back on, and get really unlucky. Unless FULLY disengaged, the TCS will turn itself back on after you've exceeded a certain speed anyway.

[Matt]

A lot of vehicles don't have TCS and a lot less traction than a jeep without it... if you happen to forget it's off, i don't see that as really an "unsafe" thing. Slightly less safe than on? Yes... but so is driving my base model accord with only front wheel drive and no special engine-killing traction control system.

Add to that the group who is asking for this type of feature is also the type of driver who actually thinks about the driving conditions and their vehicles- i doubt any of "us" would get into our vehicles during a blizzard without thinking "ok, lets make sure this 4x4 is functioning".

That's right AJ, i just told you to stay outta my jeep

[AJeepZJ]

Hmmmm. I disagree, respectfully of course! This is like saying a vehicle without a seatbelt is less safe than a vehicle with it. So far as the seatbelt isnt needed, technically, one is no more safe than the other... This is also the case for TCS's... safe/unsafe, advantages/less advantageous... Preferential words. Also I wasnt thinking in terms of incliment weather. My comments were more directed towards swerving; evading collision while avoiding turnover.

[Matt]

I don't think there's any disagreement that its a benefit for sure. Just that its a benefit, not a required piece of safety equipment like seatbelts or airbags. There's not a single car (legal anyway) that doesn't have seatbelts and airbags, but there's plenty without traction control systems. Therein lies my [respectful] disagreement with AJ on the topic of whether we should be able to do a special key dance to keep TCS off while on long off-road excursions. ... the risk of leaving it off, IMO, is minimal and not nearly on the level of "unsafe" as is not wearing seatbelts since leaving it off would put us in similar (and still somewhat better) traction &control situations than many other non-awd vehicles on the road, aaaand disabling TCS doesn't disable our airbags or seatbelts

[Matt]

.... plus I'm sure the dash would give a reminder its off, just like it currently does.

[AJeepZJ]

FWIW, seatbelts are required here, and probably will be required in every state in the near future.

So are you saying that the government should mandate that all vehicles come equipped with AWD and TCS? Cause, that seems to be what you're saying... that vehicles equipped without them are "unsafe".

I don't do government discussions, lol. But I will say that if you deduced in my response that uncle sam should mandate TCS in all vehicles, I admit I unintentionally mislead you!

I don't think there's any disagreement that its a benefit for sure. Just that its a benefit, not a required piece of safety equipment like seatbelts or airbags. There's not a single car (legal anyway) that doesn't have seatbelts and airbags, but there's plenty without traction control systems. Therein lies my [respectful] disagreement with AJ on the topic of whether we should be able to do a special key dance to keep TCS off while on long off-road excursions. ... the risk of leaving it off, IMO, is minimal and not nearly on the level of "unsafe" as is not wearing seatbelts since leaving it off would put us in similar (and still somewhat better) traction &control situations than many other non-awd vehicles on the road, aaaand disabling TCS doesn't disable our airbags or seatbelts

You'll have to pardon my passionate discussion in the topic, lol. Industrial hygiene and occupational/public health and safety is what I do. (for now anyway, lol). But, I definitely understand your argument though. And you are right, there are plenty of vehicles that are without TCS systems, especially older vehicles. But these vehicles should not be the standard for which we compare safety. I think the premise behind what I'm saying is that having a manual switch to engage/disengage the TCS at will - carries a certain amount of risk. It is difficult for me to dismiss TCS as minimal in it's application for highway safety, as this technology IS a safety feature for vehicles in which it is equipped.

But I do compromise, because I can understand the purpose for why it would need to be disabled. And If say, you came to me, told me you wanted to do what the OP is trying to accomplish. I'd probably say "under the condition that...." And in this case, it would be under the condition that the vehicle notifies the driver that TCS is disabled at a 40mph or greater, and the vehicle is used daily as a primary means of transportation. Or maybe that the vehicle is somehow registered as a recreational vehicle, or towed to site.

At the end of the day when you come home to tell your kids, family,etc, that you could have died. It will be you that will be the one grateful to be alive!

[Matt]

We're probably agreeing more than we're disagreeing here..... For instance I agree that the standard shouldn't be set lower. You're looking at it like a light switch, on/off.... safe/unsafe. I'm looking at it like a dimmer switch, on---------------------off..... safe, less safe, even lesser safe.

The reason I equated your response to government mandate was because you jumped right to a seatbelt analogy which really is more of a safe/unsafe with really no in-between. For example I would say that driving without a seatbelts is unsafe, but I would not say that driving without TCS is unsafe. But I do agree that driving with TCS is safER than driving without TCS. .... lol I bet I just made Sals head explode with that sequence.....

AJ, are you against people airing their tires down for offroading if they don't have TPMS? That would be a bigger concern IMO since its more likely they'll forget to air up.... and driving with under inflated tires is without a doubt "unsafe".

And yes, risk has levels. Your posts make it seem like driving without TCS is such a high risk that death is imminent.... I guess I need to sell my Accord that the wife is using since she's at such a high risk for an accident and its all my fault cause I could have prevented it by purchasing her a newer vehicle with new advanced traction systems.